🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in Russian state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to decide later this week on a proposal to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union officials have argued that their plan is legally sound. Their position is based on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as theft. Authorities have warned of retaliatory measures, such as confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has assumed a key position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

In comments interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in EU countries are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials said they are developing steps to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European companies. They are also designing protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she stated. "It also sends a clear signal that when you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."